Integration without unification: an argument for pluralism in the biological sciences.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In this article, we consider the tension between unification and pluralism in biological theory. We begin with a consideration of historical efforts to establish a unified understanding of evolution in the neo-Darwinian synthesis. The fragmentation of the evolutionary synthesis by molecular evolution suggests the limitations of the general unificationist ideal for biology but not necessarily for integrating explanations. In the second half of this article, we defend a specific variety of pluralism that allows for the integration required for explanations of complex phenomena without unification on a large scale.
منابع مشابه
Beyond Reduction and Pluralism: Toward an Epistemology of Explanatory Integration in Biology
The paper works towards an account of explanatory integration in biology, using as a case study explanations of the evolutionary origin of novelties— a problem requiring the integration of several biological fields and approaches. In contrast to the idea that fields studying lower level phenomena are always more fundamental in explanations, I argue that the particular combination of disciplines...
متن کاملWhy resilience is unappealing to social science: Theoretical and empirical investigations of the scientific use of resilience
Resilience is often promoted as a boundary concept to integrate the social and natural dimensions of sustainability. However, it is a troubled dialogue from which social scientists may feel detached. To explain this, we first scrutinize the meanings, attributes, and uses of resilience in ecology and elsewhere to construct a typology of definitions. Second, we analyze core concepts and principle...
متن کاملPluralism in the sciences is not easily dismissed.
The unification scheme proposed by Henriques in his article "Psychology Defined" (this issue) holds promise as a coherent and comprehensive approach to psychology and as a helpful way to think about the relation of psychology to other sciences. There is, nevertheless, room for concern that there is no concept of unification to date that does not neglect important dimensions of human experience....
متن کاملPhysicalism, Pluralism and Causal Completeness: On the Metaphysical Foundations for Philosophy of Mind
The so-called Exclusion argument (Kim 2000; Papineau 2004) about mental causation applies one premise that is typically accepted without much discussion: the thesis of causal completeness of the physical domain (CCP). In part one I evaluate Papineau’s (2001) argument for the CCP. I argue that this argument is not satisfying and that it is incomplete. The rest of the thesis is dedicated to an al...
متن کاملPluralism; an Old but New Phenomenon in Socio-political Processes
This paper presents pluralism as a historical process. The term pluralism frequently appears not only in the field of political philosophy but also in social sciences. In one sense, the growing literature is stimulating and enriching, nevertheless the abundance of material attempting to explain the various interpretations of pluralist theory can be convoluted and overwhelming. Despite the const...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The American naturalist
دوره 168 Suppl 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006